Having already
done that, I took pleasure in answering him by email with a cryptic 10 am
January 17!
Which
brought me an email from daughter-in-law dlank in Milwaukee : Is this a
conversation with David, or something else?
So I’d
done it again – mixed up the two dlank addresses and emailed to the wrong
one. Sent her an explanation and an
apology: “…and it's ironic,” I wrote, “because the conversation
was about blunders altogether.”
And she emailed back: A tad
confusing. If the appt. was rescheduled to the 17th,
when was the original appointment that you missed? The blog implied that
you missed an appointment on the 18th.
I answered
explaining that the original appointment was indeed on the 17th; I just
waited an extra day to post the report. And then she
wrote: Not to beat a dead horse, but if your original
eye appointment was for 10 am, was it just literary license when you posted
that you set your cell phone alarm for 12:30 for a 1 pm appointment? Or
was there a calendar problem, as well?
And
that’s when I answered You won't be too surprised that I just noticed we
seem to have yet another blunder here. The original appointment, the one I walked out on, was
indeed for 1
pm on the 17th. The 10 am is for the replacement appointment, and I meant to email (but typed the wrong date as well as the wrong dlank) -- that it’s for Friday January 31.
Mixing the two Dlank addresses is quite forgivable - we should set you up in someway to make that simplier! We do have a shortage of initials in this family, with ALanks and Dlanks!
ReplyDelete