The
face is based on a Victorian engraving that was a prettied-up version of the only authentic portrait we have.
If we had more than head and shoulders on the banknote, you'd see the wedding ring that was added by that engraver, more than half a century after the famously unwed author's death.
The original -- unfinished -- little watercolor was done by Jane's sister Cassandra, who may have shared the fictional Emma Woodhouse's difficulty with drawing faces.
And the
mansion shown in the background, possibly chosen as a nod to Downton Abbey, was
not Jane’s home at all. Godmersham Park belonged to Jane’s brother Edward, the
adopted heir of some wealthy cousins.
Jane herself was lucky, in her 30s -- the last decade of her life -- to find a permanent home in a simple cottage that is now visited by thousands of
pilgrims every year.
My bet is
that we haven’t heard the last of this.
My confidence in the Jane Austen Society of the UK is high. Its members will browbeat the Bank of England into getting this right, well before the 2017 issue date for the Janie.
ReplyDeleteGuess I'm in the minority, but I don't mind the quote and I think even JA would have preferred having a flattering portrait to going down in history as Miss Crudely-Drawn Grimface. Perhaps they should have used the picture of her from the back, sitting outdoors, all in blue.
ReplyDeleteHowever I entirely agree that Chawton Cottage should be the background, not Godmersham. What were they thinking??
No one has commented on the faint drawing of a young woman bent over a desk. I assume she's writing. Is that a Brock or a Thomson?
Meg